SEMANAT in practice
Knowledge Hub · Recycling · Purchasing

PP and PE recycled pellets: what to check before buying — and when the next lot behaves differently

Before you buy PP or PE recycled pellets — regranulate — or regrind, you settle what exactly you are buying and what data you will get with every lot. After the purchase a second question appears: the next delivery runs differently from the last one — it flows differently, outgasses, shows specks or gives a different dimension. In both situations the same things help: a comparison of the lot documents, the actual process conditions and the way measurements were made. On that basis you choose any additional tests and prepare concrete data for the conversation with the supplier.

PRACTICERECYCLING · PURCHASING · QUALITYEnglish edition · 14 Oct 2026 · sources checked 8 Oct 2026 · SEMANAT editorial team
Editorial guide based on the sources listed below. It does not replace the documentation of a specific grade or its qualification in your application.

Short answer. You cannot judge a lot by the MFR and density from a data sheet alone. Before buying, agree what data you will get with every lot and ask for a sample from the lot you are buying. Afterwards, compare every delivery with the lot that worked: the lot documents (CoA), the MFR measured under the same conditions, labelled samples and the process records from both periods. Tests such as ash content, DSC or FTIR are not automatically required for every lot unless the agreed specification or inspection plan says so; otherwise order them when a specific symptom points to them. Acceptance limits are agreed with the supplier for your product and your process.

First, establish what exactly you are buying

The words in an offer describe different things and are not interchangeable:

  • regrind — plastic ground mechanically, without remelting; the particle size depends on the mill screen;
  • regranulate (recycled pellets) — plastic that has been remelted and pelletised again; whether and through which screen the melt was filtered is something to establish with the supplier;
  • origin is separate information: post-industrial waste (PIR) or post-consumer material (PCR), the supplier’s own waste or material from a third party, and from which products.

Ask what the supplier calls a lot. ISO 15270 distinguishes a quantity with one unique designation from a quantity produced under conditions considered uniform; it also describes homogenisation, i.e. evening out the properties within the material. Ask plainly: is a lot one big bag, one day of production or a whole truckload? The answer decides what the lot certificate covers and whether two bags from one delivery should behave the same (glossary entry Lot / batch).

Before the first order, ask for a sample from the same lot you will buy. How much you need depends on what the trial is meant to check; a trial on an injection moulding machine is described in the Polish article Material trial on an injection moulding machine (in Polish).

Symptom, possible cause and what to compare

The table does not point to the cause. It helps you collect data from both deliveries before you change the next parameter or file a complaint. Process notes are assigned to the technology: injection moulding or extrusion, including blown film.

SymptomPossible causeWhat to compareWhat this comparison does not settle
The new lot flows differently: in injection moulding a different shot weight or injection pressure, in blown film a different bubble stabilityA different composition or processing history of the material; different MFR test conditions in the documents; changes in the process or in the regrind ratioThe MFR of both lots measured under the same conditions (temperature, load) and by the same method; the CoA of both lots; process records from both periodsA matching MFR does not mean the same behaviour in the process — MFR is a single measuring point
Outgassing, bubbles, streaksMoisture on the surface of the material, e.g. condensation after moving it from a cold warehouse; volatiles; in injection moulding also process causes — a hot-runner troubleshooting guide lists, among others, overheated melt and too low back pressureStorage conditions of both deliveries; water content determined by the same method; records of melt temperatures and, in injection moulding, back pressureWeight loss on a moisture balance is a different method from water determination to ISO 15512 — give the method with the result
Specks, inclusions, blocked screen pack (extrusion) or blocked hot-runner nozzles (injection moulding)Contamination, e.g. other polymers or metal; dust and fines in regrindVisual inspection of samples from both lots; information on sorting, metal separation and melt filtration; for regrind, particle size fraction and the share of finesA declared filter screen does not rule out larger inclusions
Different colour or odourLot-to-lot differences — colour can vary even between homogenised deliveries; storage conditions (moisture, high temperature, UV)Samples of both lots side by side; whether colour is in the specification; packaging and storageWhether the change in colour or odour comes with a change in properties — that needs a measurement
Different dimension or shrinkage of mouldings (injection moulding)A different filler content; a different lot composition; changes in the process; a different measuring time or methodAsh content and density of both lots determined by the same method; process records; parts measured after the same time from moulding and by the same methodCoincidence in time with a change of delivery neither proves nor rules out a cause
Regrind feeds or doses unevenlyA different bulk density, particle shape and size distribution; a different regrind share in the blendThe bulk density of both lots; particle size fraction and the share of fines; the actual regrind shareWhether the problem lies in the material or in the feeding system

Material, process or measurement?

Injection moulding guides divide the causes differently. Autodesk Moldflow lists material causes of dimensional variation (including differences in properties and pigmentation), process causes and machine causes. The Mold-Masters hot-runner guide points mainly to machine and mould causes and, on the material side, to too much regrind. Neither says which cause applies to your line. So check in parallel:

  • the material — the documents and results of both lots, the regrind share, storage;
  • the process — the machine and the tool (mould or die), temperatures and, in injection moulding, also holding pressure, back pressure and cycle time;
  • the measurement — the same method, conditions and instrument for both deliveries.

Where do differences in the material itself come from? A recyclate carries the variability of the stream it was made from. In a Danish study of household waste, the processability of PE and PP depended on the kinds of packaging in the stream. Then there is the processing history: in laboratory studies, successive processing cycles of PP shortened the chains and raised the MFR.

A study of 10 commercial PE and PP recyclates from five suppliers (Gall et al., 2021) found foreign components in all samples — from fillers to other polymers — in amounts that differed between suppliers. That study compared suppliers, not successive lots from one supplier, so it does not say how much deliveries from one source vary. That has to be checked on your own lots.

What a TDS says and what a lot document says

A technical data sheet (TDS) describes the grade, usually with typical values. Examples from public data sheets (not SEMANAT offers): the data sheet of the recyclate Purpolen PP Y55 (Borealis / mtm plastics, 2023) states that the values are typical and are not to be used for specifications, and both that sheet and the PP regrind data sheet of Attero (2021) note that suitability for the application is checked by the buyer. According to the Purpolen sheet the producer homogenised deliveries in truckloads and still reserved that colour may vary between lots.

A certificate of analysis (CoA) gives results for a specific lot. Ask which parameters are tested for every lot and which only periodically. The CoA of one lot does not confirm the parameters of the next, so it is worth collecting the certificates and comparing them lot by lot — that is also how the LyondellBasell polyolefin injection moulding guide uses them.

MFR: compare only comparable results

MFR is the mass of melt that flows through the die of a plastometer under defined conditions. The result depends on the temperature and the load, which are chosen according to the material standard. A number without conditions is not fit for comparison.

MFR describes flow at one point, at a shear rate much lower than in processing. Two lots with a similar MFR can therefore behave differently, and a change in MFR does not say where it came from. When comparing lots, check:

  • the test conditions (temperature, load) and the standard;
  • whether both results come from the same laboratory or from an agreed method;
  • whether the difference is larger than the spread of the measurement itself.

More on the conditions and limits of MFR: MFR / MFI: what it means — and what it does not tell you.

How to label and store samples

With every delivery:

  • take samples from several bags according to an agreed plan; for regrind, take them from different places in the bag;
  • label every sample: the supplier’s lot number, delivery date, bag number, sampling point, sampling date, what it was used for;
  • keep a reference sample from the lot that worked until the following deliveries are used up — in a sealed container, away from moisture, heat and light;
  • link the sample to the process record of the day the material went onto the machine.

Sampling of plastics waste and recyclates for testing is described in CEN/TS 16010. For external tests, agree the sampling plan with the laboratory.

Three levels of data when buying and comparing deliveries

1. Basic data and documents with every delivery

  • polymer and form (regranulate, regrind, flakes, agglomerate) and, for regranulate, whether the melt was filtered and through which screen;
  • the origin of the stream and whether the source is constant;
  • the lot number and what the supplier calls a lot;
  • MFR with value, tolerance, temperature, load and standard;
  • a CoA or lot declaration with the test methods;
  • for regrind and flakes: particle size fraction, share of fines, bulk density with the method;
  • moisture with the method, if it matters in your process — also for material stored in the cold, because moisture can condense on cold material;
  • packaging and storage.

2. Tests chosen by symptom and risk

These tests are not automatically required for every lot unless the agreed specification or inspection plan says so. Otherwise you order them when a specific signal appears or the product demands it. Compare every result with the reference sample, measured by the same method.

TestWhen it can help and what it does not settle
Ash content (ISO 3451-1)When the amount of filler matters or the density has changed. Ash is the whole inorganic residue, so it does not say which filler it comes from and cannot separate several inorganic components. Give it with the temperature and the method.
Density (ISO 1183-1)For comparing the uniformity of lots. In the study of commercial recyclates, density depended both on inorganic components and on admixture of the second polyolefin, so read it together with the ash content. The result depends on sample preparation.
DSC (ISO 11357-3)When MFR, ash content or density deviate without explanation, or the process suggests admixture of another polymer. An additional melting peak can indicate the second polyolefin; estimating its share is a laboratory task. Compare the result with the reference sample.
FTIRFor identifying admixtures. With PP copolymer, PE bands can come from the copolymer itself, and bands attributed to other polymers (e.g. PS) can also come from additives and pigments. Leave the interpretation to the laboratory.
Water content (ISO 15512)When the material outgasses or gives streaks. The standard covers plastics in the form of powder, granules and finished articles; agree the preparation of regrind or flake samples with the laboratory.

A single test does not settle the cause of a problem on the machine.

3. Requirements agreed between supplier and buyer

The standards EN 15345:2025 (PP recyclates) and EN 15344:2025 (PE recyclates) name the main characteristics of recyclates and the methods for testing them. They serve as a common basis on which the parties agree a specification. This guide gives no acceptance limits — you set them for your product and your process. To agree:

  • which parameters, with which tolerance, are tested for every lot and which periodically (inspection plan);
  • test methods and conditions, including the laboratory that decides in case of a dispute;
  • whether admixture of another polymer is acceptable and how it is determined;
  • how the supplier informs you about a change of waste source or process;
  • what happens with a lot outside the specification.

What to send the supplier

“The material is different” gives the supplier nothing to check. Prepare:

  • the numbers of both lots — the one that worked and the problem lot — and their CoA;
  • your own results with the method, conditions and laboratory;
  • a description of the symptom: what, since when, on which machine, in which product;
  • process records from both periods and what else changed (regrind share, drying, machine, mould or die);
  • photos and the kept, labelled samples of both lots.

Such a set lets the supplier compare the lots on their side and lets you tell whether the material, the process or the measurement changed.

Questions we hear

Are a matching MFR and density enough to treat a lot as the same?
No. MFR is one measuring point of flow, and density depends on the filler and on admixture of a second polyolefin at the same time, so on its own it does not show what has changed. Compare with the reference lot and watch the behaviour in the process.

Does every lot need DSC or FTIR?
Not automatically. These tests are required if the agreed specification or inspection plan provides for them; otherwise match them to the symptom. With every delivery, compare the agreed basic data with the reference lot.

How much regrind can be added to virgin material?
The sources give no single value. LyondellBasell recommends controlling the regrind share carefully, and Autodesk Moldflow — limiting it to the level recommended by the material supplier. The acceptable share follows from the product requirements, the grade producer’s recommendations and a trial; what matters is that it stays constant.

How SEMANAT can help

We match PP and PE regranulate and regrind to the product and the process. The delivery documents you send us support material selection: they help establish what to ask about and which material may fit your specification. SEMANAT is not a laboratory — we do not carry out tests, issue expert opinions or settle complaints.

Comparing deliveries, or looking for a more consistent source? Describe the product and the process and give the material requirements. If you give an MFR, add the test conditions. If you are comparing deliveries, attach the available CoA of both lots. In Poland, sales are possible from a single big bag, depending on the material, location and availability, and you can collect the material yourself. Where SEMANAT arranges transport, full truckloads are preferred because of the freight cost; this is not a minimum order. Customers outside Poland are served in English.

CONTACT US

Selling regranulate or regrind? Describe the lot on the page for suppliers.

Limits of this guide

  • The figures and examples come from public data sheets and publications (individual materials and studies), not from SEMANAT offers or tests. Do not transfer them directly to your material.
  • The guide gives no acceptance limits, MFR tolerances, allowable moisture, regrind share or process parameters — they depend on the product, the process and the contract.
  • Blown film has its own requirements for gels and filtration, which this guide does not cover. Regranulates of PA and other hygroscopic polymers need a different approach to moisture.
  • Food contact, medical products and recycled-content declarations require documentation of origin and an assessment of legal requirements that this guide does not cover.

Sources and standards

Standards — for standards we used only the official scope descriptions or official previews; the full texts of the standards were not read.

Producer and institutional publications

Scientific publications

  • Gall M., Freudenthaler P. J., Fischer J., Lang R. W. — Characterization of Composition and Structure–Property Relationships of Commercial Post-Consumer Polyethylene and Polypropylene Recyclates. Polymers 13(10):1574, MDPI, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101574
  • Eriksen M. K., Christiansen J. D., Daugaard A. E., Astrup T. F. — Closing the loop for PET, PE and PP waste from households: Influence of material properties and product design for plastic recycling. Waste Management 96:75–85, 2019 (abstract used). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.005
  • Esmizadeh E., Tzoganakis C., Mekonnen T. H. — Degradation Behavior of Polypropylene during Reprocessing and Its Biocomposites: Thermal and Oxidative Degradation Kinetics. Polymers 12(8):1627, MDPI, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081627
  • Larsen Å. G., Olafsen K., Alcock B. — Determining the PE fraction in recycled PP. Polymer Testing 96:107058, 2021 (abstract used). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107058
  • Johann K. S., Reißing A., Bonten C. — Comparative Analysis of the Solid Conveying of Regrind, Virgin and Powdery Polyolefins in Single-Screw Extrusion. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 6(3):56, MDPI, 2022 (abstract used). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp6030056

Documents referred to as the reference for the terms used in the text; we do not reproduce the content of standards or publications. Sources checked: 8 Oct 2026. Technical content on this page is indicative and serves to prepare an enquiry; the parameters of a specific lot are confirmed by documentation and a trial.

Have a specific application?

Describe it in three steps
APPLICATIONWhat you make and what the part is: a housing, a technical component, film, packaging.
PROCESSTechnology and processing conditions: injection moulding, extrusion, blow moulding, thermoforming.
REQUIREMENTSProperties the product must have: stiffness, impact strength, temperature, colour, origin.
CONTACT US Tell us about the product, the process, the requirements and the current material — you do not need to know the exact grade.
Enquiry

Prefer to talk about a specific material?

Describe the product, the process, the approximate quantity and the delivery location. Please also tell us whether you can collect the material yourself.